1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is as follows, except for the following modifications and additions as stated in the following subparagraphs, the following corresponding parts of the court of first instance shall be cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act, since it is stated in the grounds of the court of first instance, in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

<수정 및 추가사항> ① 제1심 판결문 제2면 제19행부터 제3면 제2행까지의 “피고가 2008. 8. 26. ~ 작성해 준 사실을 인정할 수 있다.” 부분을 아래《 》기재와 같이 고쳐 적는다.

《피고가 원고에게 “피고가 2008. 8. 26. 원고로부터 200,000,000원을 차용하고, 2009년 9월부터 2015년 3월까지 매월 3,000,000원을 변제하기로 하되, 원금의 변제를 2회 이상 지체할 때에는 기한의 이익을 상실한다”는 내용의 차용증(갑1호증, 이하 ‘이 사건 차용증’이라 한다

)을 작성해 준 사실을 인정할 수 있다.》 ② 제1심 판결문 제3면 제12행부터 같은 면 제14행까지의 “한편, 원고가 피고로부터 ~ 사실은 당사자 사이에 다툼이 없다” 부분 뒤에 아래【 】부분을 추가한다.

【Around October 13, 200,000 won paid by the Defendant to the Plaintiff, the Defendant claimed that the sum of KRW 1,000,000 on October 22, 2009, KRW 3,000,000 on October 22, 2009, and KRW 1,000,000 on November 2, 2009, which was irrelevant to the loan certificate of this case, is the provisional payment irrelevant to the loan certificate of this case. The Defendant paid KRW 3,00,000,000 to the Plaintiff as retirement allowance of the Plaintiff. Accordingly, the Defendant’s payment of KRW 3,00,000 on December 1, 209 is a separate payment without any relation to the loan certificate of this case. According to the testimony of the witness F, the amount of KRW 1,00 on October 1, 200, KRW 300 on October 209, KRW 1000 on the account of the Plaintiff.