logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.11.16 2016고정622
사기
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 10 million.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is the representative director and the representative director of C Co., Ltd. established for real estate development business.

On May 27, 2013, the Defendant, at the office of the fifth floor of the building in Gangnam-gu, Seoul, conducted transactions with the Veterans Association on the condition of 20 million won as he/she is well aware of the president of the Veterans Association, and was in charge of the installation and replacement of the entire LED street lamps in the entire area under the jurisdiction of Ansan-si, and thus, the Veterans Association was in charge of the installation and replacement of the replacement of the LED street lamps. As such, among the construction works for the construction works for the construction of the industrial complex for PED in Pyeongtaek-si, Pyeongtaek-si, the Defendant, while carrying out as if he/she could enter into a contract for the construction of the LED street, etc. among the construction works for the construction works for the development of the MEM Qua, at Pyeongtaek-si, paid KRW 50 million to the victim F. The actual construction cost is 1.64 billion won, and the construction contract is 2 billion won, and the 400 million won, the difference is returned to D."

However, in fact, the defendant is not responsible for the new installation or replacement of the ED street lamps in the entire area under the jurisdiction of the Veterans Association in Ansan-si, but it is already aware that there was no direct relationship with the non-indicted H, who was the president of the Veterans Association or the G Matk Qua Industrial Complex Construction Corporation, as the president of the Veterans Association or the G corporation, with the non-indicted H, who was committed as if he was the head of the CED project group of the Veterans Association, and there was no intention or ability to allow the above victim to be able to be able to perform the construction of

Despite the circumstances, the defendant committed the above construction as if he could receive the above construction through Dong H, and the above false statement was made, which was obtained 50 million won from the above victim through the new bank account in the name of D Co., Ltd., and acquired it by fraud.

Summary of Evidence

1. Legal statement of the witness H;

1. The prosecutor's statement concerning H;

1. A complaint;

1. The statement of the police with F.

arrow