The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentence imposed by the court below on the defendant (five months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. The favorable circumstances in favor of the reasons for appeal: The defendant shows his attitude to recognize and reflect all of the crimes of this case.

In agreement with the victim of the crime interfering with the business of this case, the injured party does not want the punishment of the defendant.

Unfavorable circumstances: The nature of each of the crimes in this case is not somewhat weak.

The defendant committed each of the crimes of this case without being aware of even during the period of probation.

Defendant has been punished for violent crimes.

The defendants' age and character environment, including the above favorable circumstances, the relation to the victims, the motive means of crime, the circumstances after the crime, etc. of this case and all the sentencing conditions and the scope of recommended punishment according to the sentencing guidelines (a period of not less than one month).

(a) Basic crimes (Interference with Business) [Determination of Type] 1 (Interference with Business] (Special Mitigation Persons) [including serious efforts to recover damage] mitigated area (the scope of recommended punishment between January and August);

(b) No sentencing criteria are set for concurrent crimes (obscenity).

C. In light of the total of at least one month of imprisonment with prison labor for the final sentence scope according to the standards for handling multiple crimes (at least one month of the sentencing criteria is not set for concurrent crimes, and thus, the lower limit of the scope of the recommended sentence is not set), it is not recognized that the sentence imposed by the lower court is too unreasonable.

3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit.