logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2017.07.13 2016가단111836
제3자이의
Text

1. The lawsuit of the plaintiff, an incorporated association, shall be dismissed.

2. The plaintiff Gap's claim is dismissed.

3. The costs of the lawsuit.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Seoul Central District Court rendered a judgment on October 2, 2014 that "D shall pay to C 48,180,965 won per annum from September 3, 2013 to October 2, 2014 and 20% per annum from the following day to the date of full payment."

3) The Seoul High Court, the appellate court, changed the first instance judgment on August 20, 2015, ruled that "D shall pay to C 20,180,965 won with 5% interest per annum from September 3, 2013 to October 2, 2014; 20% interest per annum from the next day to the date of full payment; 5% interest per annum from the next day to the date of full payment; and 28,000 won from June 22, 2015 to August 20, 2015; and 20% interest per annum from the next day to the date of full payment." The above judgment became final and conclusive at that time (hereinafter referred to as "the judgment of this case").

B) B. B. C issued a collection order of the instant judgment to the instant court as the collection claim, KRW 60,470,242, and KRW D as the obligor, and KRW 60,470,242, and KRW D as the obligor, and KRW E Co., Ltd., F, Ltd., I, G, H, Industrial Bank of Korea, and the Republic of Korea as the third obligor. The obligor applied for the seizure and collection order of the claim against the third obligor (2016TT7699, and this court issued the seizure and collection order of the claim against the third obligor on May 25, 2016.

C. According to the order of seizure and collection as to the execution of the order of seizure and collection, the court of execution shall be the garnishee E, F, G and H.

arrow