logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2020.10.12 2020고단851
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(위험운전치상)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal Power] On June 28, 2007, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 1,000,000 as a crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act by the Seoul Southern District Court.

【Criminal Facts】

1. Around November 17, 2019, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (driving) driven a DNA rocketing car with the blood alcohol concentration of about 0.153% in the section of approximately 300 meters from the ground parking lot of the Gwanak-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City to the above apartment C-dong underground parking lot.

Accordingly, the defendant violated the prohibition of drinking driving more than twice.

2. At around 23:40 of the same day, the Defendant got knee knee kne kne kne kne kne kne kne kne kne kne kne kne kne kne kne kne kne kne kne kne kne knee kne knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee kne knee knee kle kne knee kne

Accordingly, the defendant committed violence against the victim's body.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of the defendant, witness E in part, and F;

1. Report on the results of the crackdown on drinking-driving and the circumstantial statement of the drinking-driving driver;

1. A control note and a CD;

1. Each investigation report (report on the circumstances of a model driver, specific suspect, and CCTV confirmation);

1. Previous convictions: Criminal history records and investigation reports [Attachment of the Judgment] [The defendant and his defense counsel acknowledged that the act of assaulting the victim at least five times among the facts charged in the instant case was committed, but the police officer did not have the face of the victim by hand when he listens to the statement. However, the defendant and the defense counsel asserted to the effect that the victim and the police officer dispatched to the police officer did not have the face of the victim by hand. However, the "parking area" table (508-2017-232959.9.

arrow