A defendant shall be punished by a fine of 500,000 won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is the representative of the B apartment tenant in Mineyang-si, and the victim C(the age of 47) is a person who operates the artificial complex D in the above apartment.

Although the defendant believed that the victim would introduce other occupants to the victim because the victim is the representative of the tenant, and ordered the defendant to do construction work on the apartment test at a low price, the defendant demanded additional construction without introducing other occupants. The defendant is not good for the reason that the defendant requested additional construction work on the basis that the victim had promised to do construction work on the low price despite having promised to do so, and the defendant was subject to a disposition that there was no suspicion of the victim by filing a complaint against the victim due to theft, defamation, etc.

1. On March 15, 2013, the Defendant violated the Act on Promotion, etc. of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Information Protection (Defamation) and Information Protection and Communications Network Utilization and Information Protection (hereinafter “Information and Communications Network Utilization and Information Protection Act”) revealed the fact to the public in order to defame the victim, thereby impairing the victim’s reputation by revealing the fact to the public through the information and communications network, which is called “B apartment club for prospective occupants” in the Internet site where more than 920 residents of the said apartment are admitted to the said apartment by using a mobile phone, and referring to the DNA operated by the victim by accessing the car page.

2. On March 26, 2013, the Defendant sent a text message stating, “The victim’s cell phone is bagbly bagly bagly bagly bagly bagly bagly bagly bagly bagly bag.” to the victim’s cell phone using the Defendant’s cell phone on the ground that the victim excessively demanded the expenses for the human test