A defendant shall be punished by a fine of 500,000 won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On October 18, 2016, at around 18:40, the Defendant: (a) committed several assaults against the victim D(28 taxes, women) residing in the same Ba, and the water supply and water supply, with a bad hand, and (b) committed several assaults against the victim E’s right shoulder.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of witness D and E;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police statements made to D and E;

1. Relevant Article 260 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense, Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act selection of punishment, and selection of fines;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Determination on the assertion by the Defendant and his defense counsel under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. The alleged defendant did not commit an assault against the victims as stated in the facts charged of the instant case, and rather was assaulted by the victims D.

2. 판단 이 법원이 적법하게 채택하여 조사한 증거들에 의하면 인정되는 다음과 같은 사정 즉, ① 피해자들은 수사기관 이래 이 법정에 이르기까지 일관하여 피고인이 수도세 납부문제로 피해자들과 언쟁을 벌이던 중 이 사건 공소사실 기재와 같이 피해자 D의 왼쪽 어깨를 수회 밀치고, 피해자 E의 오른쪽 어깨도 수회 밀치는 등 폭행을 하였다는 취지로 진술하고 있는 점, ② 피고인도 피해자들과 수도세 문제로 시비가 되어 화가 나서 주먹을 불끈 쥔 적은 있다는 취지로 진술하고 있을 뿐 아니라 자신도 피해자 D으로부터 폭행을 당하였다고

In light of these circumstances, the defendant committed violence after being pushed by the victims and the water supply problem at the expense.

In light of the circumstances, such as that it is reasonable to view that the defendant abused victims as stated in the facts charged of this case.