A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a period of five months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

피고인은 2014. 3. 23. 21:45경 서울 금천구 B에 있는 C 주차장에서 버스요금 문제로 버스기사와 다투고 있던 중에 112신고를 받고 출동한 서울금천경찰서 D지구대 소속 경찰관 E, F로부터 귀가를 종용받자, 위 경찰관들에게 “야! 이 씹할 놈들아! 니들이 C와 무슨 관계가 있는 것이 아니냐 오늘 내가 너희들을 죽여 버리겠다. 경찰관이면 다냐 ”라고 말하면서 손과 주먹으로 위 E의 몸통을 여러 차례 때리고, 발로 위 E의 정강이 부위를 1회 걷어찼다.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the maintenance of police officers' order and legitimate execution of their duties.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. Application of the G’s written Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The Defendant asserts that the Defendant was in a mental and physical state under the influence of alcohol at the time of committing the instant crime, as to the Defendant’s assertion of Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (abstinence of the Defendant’s act, i.e., the confession of a criminal act, the depth of the mistake is divided

In light of the evidence, the court below held that the defendant was in a state of drinking alcohol at the time of committing the crime, but considering the defendant's behavior before and after committing the crime, it seems that the defendant did not have or lacks the ability to discern things or make decisions. Thus, the above argument is rejected.