logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전고등법원(청주) 2017.07.18 2016나10958
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal against the defendants is dismissed in entirety.

2. The plaintiff's ancillary claim added at the trial.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. 1) Defendant B Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant B”)

Around March 26, 2008, Defendant C Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant C”)

3,412 square meters (hereinafter referred to as “instant land”) for the purpose of this case and the Northern-gun L. 3,412 square meters

2) On the ground, the building indicated in the separate sheet (hereinafter “instant building”)

(2) Defendant C had the construction work executed between the first and fourth floors of the instant building in accordance with the said construction work contract, and had not been paid for the construction work from Defendant B, and had the construction work discontinued around October 2008.

3) Defendant B, on July 25, 2009, is a trine Integrated Construction Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “trine Comprehensive Construction”).

(4) In accordance with the above construction contract, the Plaintiff suspended construction work with the Plaintiff after completion of the 5th floor framed construction of the instant building, the 6th floor fluorization construction, and the 5th floor fluoring construction, and the 6th floor fluoring construction, and the 5th unit fluoring construction of the instant building, and the 5th unit fluoring construction of the instant building.

(hereinafter referred to as the “instant construction”) b. of the part that the Plaintiff performed.

As to the instant building, the name of the owner was changed and the registration of ownership preservation was made 1) on January 15, 2008. As to the instant building, on August 20, 2009, Defendant B transferred KRW 1.5 billion out of the construction price claim against Defendant B, to Defendant B, the name of the owner was changed to Defendant B’s representative director G as of September 25, 2009.

3. Defendant B, on October 20, 2009, had the obligation to pay the construction cost due to the construction of the building in this case.

arrow