beta
Text
1. The Defendants jointly and severally agreed to the Plaintiff KRW 20,743,100 and Defendant B with respect thereto from September 23, 2015, and Defendant A with respect thereto.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. On November 15, 2012, the Plaintiff entered into an agreement with the Defendants (C (hereinafter referred to as “instant agreement”) on the provision of bareboat services in connection with the credit card approval system; hereinafter referred to as “instant agreement”) on November 15, 2012, the terms and conditions of the said agreement are as follows: (a) the end of the month in which 520,000 credit cards occurred from the date the approval of the credit card was granted to the end of the month in which 520,000 won of the total number of credit cards occurred or of the management support fund (including additional tax) for the month in which 50,000 won per case was offset by the amount of 50,000 won per case.
1. In any of the following cases, the Plaintiff and the Defendants may terminate this contract regardless of the duration of the contract:
(1) In cases where it is deemed difficult for a contracting party to perform a contract any longer due to defects in the relevant statutes, such as legal defects such as authorization, permission, etc. of the Government, or (a) seizure, request for auction, bankruptcy, composition, default, bankruptcy, bankruptcy, bankruptcy, bankruptcy procedure, reorganization procedure, etc.
2. In the event that the contract is terminated due to each of the reasons under paragraph (1), the defendants must return the detailed details of the support (the amount of KRW 1320,00,000,000,000 for 4 credit card investigation period, KRW 770,000,000,000,000) to the plaintiff. The defendants must pay the penalty for the penalty of KRW 520,000,00,000,000, which was agreed with the plaintiff.
B. The Defendants closed the instant marina due to financial difficulties around August 2014, and the total number of credit cards generated under the instant contract was 105,138.
C. Meanwhile, the Plaintiff, through the preparatory brief dated September 16, 2015, did not constitute the instant marina.