Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 10 million.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

On July 24, 2009, the Defendant received a summary order of KRW 1 million as a crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act from the Seoul Northern District Court.

On October 22, 2020, the Defendant driven C-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A

Accordingly, the defendant violated the prohibition of drinking driving more than twice.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Report on the circumstantial statement of a drinking driver, and investigation report made on the results of the crackdown on drinking driving (report on the situation of drinking driving);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to criminal records, reply reports, and investigation reports;

1. Relevant Articles 148-2 (1) and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act and the choice of fines for criminal facts;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act with regard to a provisional payment order is that the defendant had a record of driving under influence of alcohol, and at the same time, he/she was driving under influence of alcohol, and the occurrence of the traffic accident caused by the

On the other hand, the influence of drinking driving has been about 11 years, and the defendant again said that it would not be justified.

In addition, the defendant's age, character and conduct, environment, motive, means and result of the crime, various sentencing conditions in the trial process, such as the situation after the crime, shall be determined as the order.