A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Punishment of the crime

On March 28, 2007, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Road Traffic Act and one year and six months at the Daegu District Court. On August 8, 2013, the Daegu District Court sentenced to one year and one year of imprisonment with prison labor for the same crime, etc. in Kimcheon Branch, and on December 4, 2014, the Daegu District Court sentenced six months of imprisonment with prison labor for the crime of interference with business, etc. and completed the execution of the said sentence at the Daegu Detention House on February 8, 2015.

1. The defendant of a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) and the Road Traffic Act (driving without a license) on February 20, 2015, without obtaining a driver's license, while under the influence of alcohol on or around 00:55, the blood alcohol concentration of 0.126%;

From the front of the room to the road in the same city C, the E-Poter truck was driven from approximately 2 km to the road in the same city.

2. Around 01:00 on February 20, 2015, the Defendant interfered with the business of the victim’s main business by force for about 10 minutes, including 10 minutes, for the following reasons: (a) around February 20, 2015, the Defendant: (b) committed the crime, on the ground that the victim was under the influence of alcohol to the Defendant; and (c) there were other customers in the said car page, despite the existence of other customers in the said car page, the Defendant interfered with the business of the victim’s main business by force for about 10 minutes.

(2) On March 13, 2015, the Defendant, at around 12:00 on March 13, 2015, told other customers in the restaurant without any particular reason at the I restaurant operated by the victim H in Kimcheon-si, Kimcheon-si, the Defendant interfered with the business of the victim’s restaurant by force for approximately 20 minutes, such as “if the Defendant is placed in the restaurant by filing a report on the so-called circopic seat, thereby putting the width up by defamation.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each statement made to H and F;

1. Investigative Report (12 Report List), Main Driver's Statement, Statement on Status of Statement, Internal History Report (3No. 15 pages of Investigation Record), and Investigation Report;