Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor of six months and fines of KRW 1,00,000, and Defendant B and C shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,00,000.

Punishment of the crime

1. From August 20, 2013:0 to 05:55 on the same day, the Defendants’ co-principals, together with D, received the first seven pages by using the card from 302 to 05:5, Songpa-gu Seoul E 302, Songpa-gu, Seoul, and followed up to 300,000 won, and thereafter, the number of card numbers would be reduced if the number of card numbers is not less than three consecutive in the same number or the same infinite pattern, and the Defendants finally held a low number of card numbers would be changed. The Defendants’ co-principals 2,00 won, 3,00 won, 1,50 won, and 4,00 won, 200 won, and 3.3 billion won, namely, “huleh”.

2. Defendant A

A. At around 06:05 on August 20, 2013, at the same place as Paragraph (1) of the same Article, the Defendant: (a) exercised an official document by presenting the Defendant’s resident registration certificate under the name of the Gyeonggi-ri Market, which was an official document held by G, to the police officer, at the time of arresting a flagrant offender for the foregoing reason; and (b) holding the official document as one of his own, at the time of arresting the police officer as a flagrant offender.

B. On August 20, 2013, around 09:55, the Defendant entered his/her signature in the column for the statement of the suspect of suspect interrogation, and entered H’s signature in the column for the confirmation of the letter of arrest of flagrant offender and the statement column of the suspect of suspect interrogation, without authority, while working as if he/she had been H at the criminal police station of Songpa-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government 9 Song-gu and the criminal 3 team office.

Accordingly, the Defendant forged H’s signature for the purpose of exercising the right, and displayed it to a slope I who knew of the fact at that time as if it was actually formed.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of the defendant B and C

1. Statement made by the defendant A in the first trial record;

1. Each police suspect interrogation protocol of H and D;

1. Statement of seizure of each police;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of written confirmation;

1. Article relevant to the facts constituting an offense and the selection of punishment;

A. Articles 246(1) and 230 (Unlawful Uttering of Official Documents, Selection of Imprisonment), 239(1) and 239(2) and 239(1) of the Criminal Act of Defendant A.