logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2016.08.16 2015나18985
손해배상(의)
Text

1. The appeal filed by the Counterclaim Plaintiff is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Counterclaim Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, in addition to the following dismissal or addition, and therefore, it is acceptable to accept this as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

According to the third decision of the first instance court, the term "this Court" and "this Court" shall be deemed to read "court of the first instance," respectively, and the term "Plaintiff of the fourth 9" shall be deemed to read "Defendant."

After the third of the judgment of the first instance court, “Nos. 4 and 5 (including number 1)” was added in front of “No. 1,” and “No. 48” was added to “No. 4 and 5,” respectively, and “No. 4, the Defendant observed, at the Plaintiff’s cT-5 level of inspection conducted prior to the Defendant’s underwater alcohol, the escape of explosive disc drive and the right-hand scirrosis, 3-4, 3-4, c-4.”

2. Thus, the plaintiff's counterclaim is dismissed as it is without merit, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow