logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 순천지원 2017.04.13 2016고정578
폭행등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 2.5 million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Bodily injury and assault (2016 high class 578);

A. On August 24, 2016, at around 10:00, the Defendant: (a) assaulted the victim E (58 years of age) in front of D in 10,000, by cutting down the shape of the Defendant’s flab, and destroying the body above the bottom of the Defendant’s body, etc.; (b) in oppositioned, the Defendant flabed down the flab with hand over the bottom, thereby causing injury to the victim, such as dump, dump, tensions, etc. requiring approximately two weeks of medical treatment.

B. On August 25, 2016, the Defendant does not work here from the date when the Victim F (61) was working in the front of D, located in C at the net City of 17:30 on August 25, 2016, to his private village Dong G, who was working at that place.

For the reason that he said, he assaulted the victim by cutting down a balbbbbbbage and cutting down the bals of the victim.

2. No one shall commit any act impeding the structure of a road or traffic without justifiable grounds;

Nevertheless, from May 22, 2015 to June 17, 2016, the Defendant committed an act that interferes with traffic by setting goods, such as the increase and decrease of the number of goods and wastes, on the front roads of the operation of the Defendant in net City C from May 2, 2015 to by carrying out the goods and wastes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A written examination of suspect of some police officers related to E (including a medical certificate attached thereto);

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. Report on internal investigation (as to the attachment of photographs and videos)

1. Location and field photographs of the public property;

1. The application of Acts and subordinate statutes to remove and limit illegal obstacles to roads;

1. Relevant legal provisions of the Criminal Act, Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 114 subparag. 7 of the Road Act, and Article 75 subparag. 3 of the same Act, and the choice of fines for the crimes;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The fact that the sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the Provisional Payment Order has been committed on two occasions at intervals of the same criminal history of the accused and the same criminal history of the accused and at intervals of one day, etc. is disadvantageous to the accused.

However, the victim.

arrow