1. As to the Plaintiff KRW 96,700,000 and KRW 30,000 among them, the Defendant shall be from March 1, 2013, and KRW 40,000,000.

1. The fact that the plaintiff lent money to the defendant as stated in the sequence 1, 3, and 6 below is not a dispute between the parties and that the plaintiff lent money to the defendant as stated in the following table Nos. 1-2, 1-2, 2-2, 4, 5-6, and the whole purport of the arguments and arguments, the plaintiff may recognize the fact that he lent money to the defendant as listed in the sequence 2 below.

On October 21, 2012, the Plaintiff alleged on February 28, 2013 that the interest on the loan (original loan) due date was 30,000,000 on October 21, 201, but it appears that the last day of February 2013 was erroneous.

24% per annum 24% 2. 50,00,000 on June 11, 2013; 24% per annum 3,000 on September 11, 2014; 3,000,000 from September 16, 2013 to 3-4 months on September 16, 2013; 3,000,000 on October 1, 200 on May 22, 2013; 3,00,00,000 on April 23, 2014; and 116,70,00,000,000 won of the principal of the loan extended from the Plaintiff on April 26, 2013; and it is reasonable to view that the Plaintiff received 1,000,000 won of the principal of the loan extended from the Defendant on July 26, 2013 to 3,000,07.

Therefore, with respect to the Plaintiff the remainder of KRW 96.7 million - the total of KRW 116.7 million - the sum of the repaid amounts of KRW 20 million - KRW 10,000,000,000 from March 1, 2013 to KRW 40,000 on the following day of the due date for repayment - the amount of KRW 50,000,000 in borrowed amounts of KRW 40,000,000 from January 12, 2014 to the date of full payment, 24% per annum from January 12, 2014 to the date of full payment; ② the aggregate of the borrowed amounts of KRW 3.7 million to KRW 3,70,000 from the borrowed amounts of KRW 3.75 million from the borrowed amounts of KRW 3,70,000,000 from the date following the due date for repayment - the Plaintiff seeks payment of KRW 1,00,000.