Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 7,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On November 29, 2006, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years for a violation of the Road Traffic Act in the Seoul Central District Court on October 2006, and was sentenced to a fine of three million won or more due to a violation of the Road Traffic Act at the Suwon Friwon on February 7, 2018, and was sentenced to a summary order of at least two times under Article 44(1) of the Road Traffic Act on at least two occasions. On June 22:5, 2018, the Defendant was driving a Category B car under the influence of alcohol concentration of at least 0.68% in alcohol during the blood transfusion without a driver’s license from approximately 150 meters to the front of the Gridong branch in the same way.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Inquiries about the results of crackdown on driving under drinking, reporting on the situation of driving under drinking, reporting on the circumstances of the driver under driving under driving under drinking, and notifying the results;

1. The driver's license ledger;

1. Previous convictions in judgment: Application of a reply to inquiry, such as criminal history, (A) and Acts and subordinate statutes to report on investigation (verification of the same criminal history);

1. Article 148-2 (1) 1 and Article 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning facts constituting an offense; Article 152 subparagraph 1 and Article 43 of the Road Traffic Act (unlicensed Driving)

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the Criminal Procedure of the Provisional Payment Order had the record of causing a traffic accident while driving under drinking, and the defendant committed the same crime again only for four months after he/she was finally punished due to driving under drinking and for four months.

Considering such circumstances, the punishment prescribed in a summary order is more severe even in light of the fact that the Defendant’s mistake is against or has family members to support, and the circumstances alleged by the Defendant, such as driving circumstances, etc., in light of the equity of punishment and the need to eradicate drinking in our society.

It does not seem that it does not appear.

the same as above.