1. The Defendants shall jointly and severally serve as KRW 18,052,300 on the Plaintiff and as a result, from November 17, 2015 to January 14, 2016.

1. The facts subsequent to the facts do not conflict between the parties, or can be recognized by comprehensively taking account of the respective entries in Gap 1-5, 8-27 (including paper numbers), Eul 1, and the overall purport of arguments. A.

The plaintiff is an organization composed of sectional owners and tenant owners for the purpose of the management and operation of Songpa-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government (hereinafter referred to as "the commercial building in this case"), and completed the registration of incorporation on February 1, 1989 by obtaining authorization from the competent authority pursuant to Article 7 of the former Wholesale and Retail Business Promotion Act (amended by Act No. 4211 of January 13, 1990; hereinafter referred to as "former Wholesale and Retail Business Promotion Act") and Article 28 of the former Small and Medium Enterprise Cooperatives Act (amended by Act No. 4211 of January 13, 1990).

Then, the plaintiff obtained a market establishment permit under the former Wholesale and Retail Business Promotion Act on April 3, 1991, and then entered into a management and takeover contract with Rap Housing Development Co., Ltd. which was engaged in the management business as a market opener and was engaged in the market management business on December 1, 1995, and obtained a market establishment permit from the head of Songpa-gu Office under Article 6 (2) of the former Wholesale and Retail Business Promotion Act.

Meanwhile, the Plaintiff registered the opening of a superstore to the head of Songpa-gu pursuant to Article 8(1) of the Distribution Industry Development Act on November 14, 2014 and Article 5(4) of the Enforcement Rule of the same Act. The Plaintiff is a superstore manager under Article 12(3) of the Distribution Industry Development Act and Article 6(4) of the Enforcement Rule of the same Act.

B. Defendant C is the owner of the instant shopping mall B-1 Dong 207 (hereinafter “instant store”). Defendant B leased the instant store from Defendant C on December 31, 2006 and submitted a occupancy report to the Plaintiff, and then, Defendant C left the instant store on November 30, 2014.

C. The plaintiff has collected management expenses from merchants who actually engage in the business while managing the commercial building of this case, and the management expenses are cleaning expenses.