The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal by the defendant was erroneous in the judgment below which found the defendant guilty of the facts charged in this case and did not interfere with the execution of official duties in the process of defending the police officer D with the knowledge that he had arrested the police officer D, who was aware of the preceding day before the arrest of the police officer D, three times, and did not interfere with the execution of official duties, and the sentence (six months of imprisonment and one year of suspended execution) imposed by the court below is unreasonable.

2. Determination:

A. A. According to the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below, D, the victim police officer, stated that "I wish to open the door to arrest a female police officer who was arrested before the Yongsan Police Station C," and the victim stated that "I am am sweet, am sweet and sweet the sweet," and that I am am sweet, and am sweet the chest at the time of the court below stated that I am sweld and am sweld by the defendant entering the Yongsan Police Station C. At the time of the court below, I am sweld and am sweld by the defendant, and that D was sweld by the defendant to correct the defendant, and the defendant was sweld with the clothes of the breast part of the chest part of the defendant, was sweld with the defendant, and that there was no reason to view that the defendant committed the crime of this case by mistake of facts at the time of the court below's testimony and defense.

B. The Defendant’s submission of a written agreement with the police officer D at the lower court on the assertion of unfair sentencing was favorable to the Defendant. However, even though the Defendant, at the Yongsan Police Station C prior to the occurrence of the instant case, was arrested as a flagrant offender on the ground that there was a serious desire for female police officers in pregnancy at the Yongsan Police Station C.