1. All of the plaintiff's claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Judgment on the plaintiff's assertion

A. The gist of the Plaintiff’s assertion is as follows: (a) upon receiving a proposal from D’s actual operator E to make an investment of KRW 17 million in the mutual aid business, the Plaintiff transferred KRW 17 million to the Defendant B and the Defendant C, who is the name of D partner, with the intent to make an investment of KRW 17 million in the mutual aid business.

그런데 E과 피고들은 원고에게 D의 수익금 및 D의 영업을 양도하여 사업을 영위한 F의 수익금을 배분하지 아니한 채 원고의 투자금 및 수익금을 가로챘으므로, 피고들은 연대하여 원고의 투자금 1,700만 원 및 수익금 중 일부 지급액 300만 원을 제외한 1,600만 원의 합계 3,300만 원을 지급할 의무가 있다.

B. According to each of the statements in the card Nos. 1, 3 through 6, the fact that the Plaintiff remitted KRW 15 million to the account in the name of Defendant B on November 6, 2014, and KRW 1,227,200 to the account in the name of Defendant C on November 17, 2014 is recognized.

However, each of the evidence Nos. 2 and 4 through 10 submitted by the Plaintiff was acquired by the Defendants by acquiring the Plaintiff’s investment funds.

It is not sufficient to recognize that the profits to be distributed to the Plaintiff have been embezzled, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it.

(O) In light of the above, the Plaintiff’s assertion is an issue of the settlement of investment and profit distribution between E and the Plaintiff, a substantial counterpart to the transaction. Therefore, the Plaintiff’s assertion cannot be accepted as it is without merit

3. The plaintiff's claim of this case is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.