A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

An applicant for compensation shall be dismissed.

Punishment of the crime

At around 18:40 on February 12, 2013, the Defendant, a proxy engineer, tried to operate the four-time operation of the Defendant’s vehicle and called “the victim”, but, on the ground that the victim attempted to drive the four-time operation of the Defendant’s vehicle, the Defendant carried the city expense to the victim’s end on the ground that the victim’s flab was neglected and continued to operate the four-time operation, and then laid down the flab on the floor, flabing the flab of the victim’s flab, cutting down the body above the floor, cutting down the victim’s face on a hand, and put the victim’s face on about six-time treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each protocol concerning the examination of the suspect against the defendant;

1. A written diagnosis of injury;

1. Application of each statute on photographs;

1. Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes;

1. Article 32(1)2 and 3 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Promotion, etc. of Legal Proceedings, etc. of Application for Compensation Order (the scope of liability for compensation is not clear) that the deliberation of the victim's grounds for sentencing is serious and that the deposit of the defendant alone cannot be deemed to have been restored to the victim's damage (the victim's treatment fees receipt, etc. submitted by the victim shall be sentenced to 2 million won in the previous treatment expenses). The victim is a fine, but has the records of repeated similar crime. The degree of the assault in this case has the statement of the defendant or detailed physical conditions (the victim has 56 years of age with 56 severe work experience) of the defendant and the victim (the victim has 11,12) after the assault in this case, and the photographs (Evidence record) of the victim and the defendant after the assault in this case and the defendant at the time of arrival of the police (Evidence record 24), the assault in this case appears to have been a unilateral assault of the defendant, provided that the defendant has divided criminal facts and has deposited part of the money.

(b) for more than one year.