Text
1. The Defendants: (a) KRW 5.5 billion to each Plaintiff, respectively; and (b) KRW 5.5 billion to February 12, 2015, respectively.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. The status of the parties 1) Defendant B Co., Ltd. (the first trade name was H, but was changed to the present trade name on September 3, 2009;
hereinafter referred to as “Defendant Company”).
From around 2007, Plaintiff I (hereinafter referred to as “I”) and Plaintiff I (hereinafter referred to as “I”)
JJ as a Chinese subsidiary (hereinafter referred to as “J”) upon being supplied with each of its main body from each other.
(2) Defendant C is the actual operator of Defendant C and J.
Defendant D, while working in K, was selected as a manufacturer of LM model products from the U.K. headquarters (hereinafter “L company”) around June 2008, and was employed by the Plaintiff company from July 1, 2008 to October 2009, and served as the Plaintiff’s business director from November 2009 to March 2010.
Defendant E works as the research institute of Defendant E from January 2009, and is in charge of the development of the recreation.
From March 2009, Defendant F served as a person in charge of the research and development of the company's internal recreation from March 2009.
Defendant G served as a director of Defendant Company from August 2008, a production-general manager from March 201, and a production-general vice president from February 2012.
B. On June 2008, the Plaintiff’s Nitr Development 1) Nitrance (it can be divided into five Nitr and brance in the form of a string import vehicle installed on a vehicle combined with a tamprator and main body, which can be installed on a vehicle. However, VNrance used mainly for the past is a machine converting an Abroutr and an Abrouter into digital format.