Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. On December 2, 2015, the Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a vehicle of the Do of the Republic of Korea (hereinafter “UP”) and the violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (hereinafter “AF”) and the Road Traffic Act (hereinafter “AF”). The Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol at around 01:37 on December 2, 2015, was driving a vehicle of the Do of the Republic of Korea in the direction of the four-distance distance from the direction of the AWF.
Since the place is where the center line of yellow-ray is installed, the driver of the vehicle has a duty of care to safely proceed along the road-centered right lane to prevent accidents in advance.
Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and went through an intersection and proceeded to the left-hand side of the Defendant’s front left-hand side at the victim D (59) where the Defendant stopped to the intersection signal at one lane in the opposite direction at the time, due to the negligence of breaking the center line, and driving along the intersection, received the front left-hand side of the vehicle of the Defendant.
Ultimately, the Defendant’s negligence in the course of performing the above duties, thereby incurring bodily injury to the climatic salt that requires approximately two weeks of treatment, and at the same time, stated the foregoing E vehicle owned by the F Company as “48,958 won” in the indictment of KRW 468,958, such as the front part of the clifer, etc. However, in light of the estimate, it appears to be a clerical error in the “468,958 won”.
Even though it is damaged to be reasonable, it immediately stopped and does not take measures such as aiding the damaged person, and escaped as it is.
2. On December 2, 2015, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (drinking) driven a car in the above Col-do while under the influence of alcohol content of about 0.084% in the section of about 25 K from the front of a mutually aesthetic restaurant in the Daejeon Seo-dong, Daejeon, to the Daejeon Dong-gu G apartment in around 02:00 on the same day.
Summary of Evidence
1. Statement by the defendant in court;
1. The police of D. D.