1. The Defendant’s KRW 5 million and the Plaintiff’s five percent per annum from May 6, 2015 to September 9, 2016, and the following day.

There is no dispute between the parties or according to the statements in Gap evidence Nos. 1 and 3, the defendant distributed a sample sample with the contents of "the Domination of business rights from the I company, a priority right holder of the business in Seongbuk-gu Seoul, as the plaintiff's business," on May 5, 2015, the defendant provided that the plaintiff provided a bribe to 2003 in the history of the public interest and the construction of related public officials, and the number of the public officials," and that "the Domination of the GTX business fraud: the Domination: the Domination of the business rights from the I company, a priority holder of the business in the public interest of the plaintiff's business in Seongbuk-gu, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul, and the Domination of the plaintiff company's G was named as the "H", and the Domination of the plaintiff's reputation by providing the plaintiff's public official detained with the right to receive a bribe related to history, and the defendant was not guilty by 2015.

Thus, the defendant is responsible for compensating for intangible damages that the plaintiff suffered due to false facts in the open space, and the defendant shall determine the amount of damages to be compensated by the defendant in consideration of the degree, motive, and other circumstances revealed in the pleading.

Therefore, from May 6, 2015, the Defendant’s claim against the Plaintiff for damages for delay calculated at the rate of 5% per annum as stipulated in the Civil Act from September 9, 2016, which is the date of the instant judgment, to September 9, 2016, and 15% per annum as stipulated in the Act on Special Cases concerning Expedition, etc. of Legal Proceedings from the following day to the date of full payment.