1. The Defendant’s KRW 79,054,698 as well as the Plaintiff’s annual rate of 5% from December 21, 2009 to February 6, 2015.

1. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. At around 8:50 on December 21, 2009, B entered into a bus C (hereinafter “Defendant vehicle”)

(ii) One-lane (a overtaking bus exclusive bus lanes) between five-lanes in the direction of the Kimpo Airport in the direction of locking from the direction of the Kimpo Airport, as shown in the attached Form No. 282, 282, Jin Chang-dong, Gangseo-gu, Seoul.

(ii)a bus stop (the bus stop located on the center of a bus) in the right-hand side of the course due to neglect of the duty of front-way stop while proceeding at a speed of about 30 km per hour.

) In order to cross the left-hand side without permission from the five-lanes, the Plaintiff’s left-hand side part of the bus projected by a bus stopped on the two-lanes, which was stopped on the left-hand side of the Defendant’s vehicle, conflict with the front part of the Defendant’s vehicle with the front part of the front part of the Defendant’s vehicle, and caused the Plaintiff to suffer from injury, such as an external trauma, cerebrovascular, etc.

(2) The Defendant is an insurer who entered into a comprehensive automobile insurance contract with respect to the Defendant’s vehicle.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1, 5, 15, Eul evidence 1 (including each number; hereinafter the same shall apply) or video, the purport of the whole pleadings

B. According to the facts of recognition of the above facts of liability, the defendant is liable to compensate for the damages suffered by the plaintiff due to the accident of this case as the insurer of defendant vehicle.

(c) The instant accident location is the overtaking line of the bus exclusive lanes. (ii) The bus was stops on the two-lanes (b) of the five-lanes of the bus exclusive lanes.

3) At the vicinity of the bus stops, there was a pedestrian crosswalk in the vicinity of the bus stops. 4) In order to cross without permission, the Plaintiff was involved in the instant accident as seen above with the bus stopped on the two-lanes among the five-lanes.

5 The Plaintiff’s error was the cause of the occurrence of the instant accident and the expansion of damages, and the Defendant’s liability is limited to 20% by taking into account all circumstances, such as the background of the accident.

2...