1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. The plaintiff's assertion and judgment that the defendant has a duty to deliver the above building to the plaintiff since January 30, 2007, since the defendant illegally occupied the building listed in the attached list (hereinafter "the building of this case") from January 30, 207 to the present date.

In addition, it is unclear whether or not the defendant occupies the building of this case only with the descriptions of evidence Nos. 2 and 4, and even if the defendant occupies the building of this case, in order for the plaintiff to obtain delivery of the building of this case, there is a legitimate authority to seek delivery of the building of this case against the defendant under the contract or agreement. However, it is insufficient to recognize that the evidence submitted by the plaintiff has a legitimate authority to seek delivery of the building of this case to the plaintiff, and there is no other evidence to prove otherwise.

Therefore, the plaintiff's assertion is without merit.

2. Accordingly, the Plaintiff’s claim is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.