logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 고양지원 2017.11.24 2017고단1680
사기방조
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant, under the direction of the phishingman, released the amount of damage caused by the commission of the phishing, and attempted to help the Defendant commit a telephone financial fraud by the phishing staff, etc., by delivering it to the phishing staff.

On April 7, 2017, 10:12 on April 7, 2017, the employee called the victim B to commit an offense committed by bank employees.

In this context, the new name passbook was confirmed from among the presidential bankbooks used for the crime.

It is necessary to confirm whether the party has become related to a crime due to the end of time, and to confirm the fairness of the crime, and to transfer KRW 10 million to a new bank account under A's name.

“A false statement,” and the victim was issued KRW 10 million to the account in the name of the defendant on the same day.

In order to assist the Defendant on the same day, the Defendant used the said new bank account to the singing singing singing sing sing sing sing sing sing sing sing sing sing sing sing sing sing sing sing sing sing sing sing sing sing sing sing sing

Accordingly, the Defendant was able to protect the Defendant by facilitating the commission of the phishing staff.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against B;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes regarding the receipt of remittance details and transaction details;

1. Article 347 (1) and Article 32 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts and Articles 347 (1) and 32 (1) of the Criminal Act (elective of imprisonment);

1. Article 32(2) of the Criminal Act mitigated for aiding and abetting, and Article 55(1)3 of the same Act

1. The so-called phishing crime, such as this case’s reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act, needs to be strictly punished for the crime of deceiving a large number of unspecified people in a systematic and professional manner by sharing the roles of a large number of people. The defendant is the above.

arrow