logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2013.04.05 2013고정770
교통사고처리특례법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 800,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a new franchise-XG car.

On October 30, 2012, the Defendant driven the above car on October 21, 2012, and proceeded at a speed of about 40 km from the original intersection to the large quarantine speed of about 40 km along the three-lanes in front of the intersection of the Hando-dong, Yeongdeungpo-gu, Seoul Metropolitan Government.

Since it is a road with signal apparatus installed at the front of that place, a person engaged in driving service has a duty of care to prevent accidents by proceeding in accordance with the new code.

Nevertheless, the defendant neglected to do so and found it late from the right side of the vehicle running in accordance with the new line from the direction of the vehicle running in the course of the defendant's to the left side. However, without being avoided the vehicle, the defendant was able to take the front side of the vehicle left right side of the defendant's vehicle with the front side of the above DST520 vehicle, and the above DST520 vehicle was pushed back to the right side of the E driver's vehicle driving in the same direction as the above DST520 vehicle was pushed down to the right side, and the above DM520 vehicle was carried out in the same direction.

Ultimately, the Defendant, by occupational negligence, suffered injury to the victim C (ma, 32 years of age), who is a driver of the said DM520 car, such as “satison salt,” which requires approximately three weeks of medical treatment, injury to the victim G (V, 29 years of age), which requires approximately three-day medical treatment, such as “satis on the left side,” and injury to the victim E (V, 53 years of age), who is a driver of the said FMW car, for about two weeks of medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the occurrence of each traffic accident in C and E preparation;

1. The actual condition of traffic accidents;

1. Application of each written diagnosis (C, G, and E) statute;

1. Article 3 (1) of the relevant Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, Article 268 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts;

2.Article 40 of the Criminal Code of Trade and Trade.

arrow