1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On July 15, 1994, the Plaintiff was publicly appointed as local fire fighters and was promoted to local fire fighters on March 20, 2009, and served as the king fire fighters from May 24, 2010.

B. On October 4, 2012, the Defendant rendered a disposition of suspension from office for one month against the Plaintiff on the ground that the following acts by the Plaintiff were in violation of Articles 48 and 55 of the Local Public Officials Act and Article 3(2) of the Fire Officials Service Regulations, which constitute grounds for disciplinary action under Article 69(1) of the Local Public Officials Act.

Although the Fire and Disaster Headquarters issued several public questions prohibiting speculative entertainments through the establishment of public office discipline at the National Fire and Disaster Headquarters, from March 2012 to April 5, 2012, 7.5 million won was asked at the cafeteria located in Ansan-si, Sinsi-si, and the house of Dong fee staff members (B) while gambling with fire officers and civilians. In consultation with the local fire fighter B who lost a large amount of money due to gambling, the civilian purchased the Kameras in consultation with the local fire fighter B, taken the Kameras used by the Dominas, and the Dominas in April 2012 with the local fire fighter B, who was employed by the local fire fighter E, filed a complaint with the police without returning the money that he lost. In the process of the investigation in this case, the Domin as well as the Dominas in consultation with the public official in charge of the audit and inspection of the public official in charge of the Dominas and the other interested parties' testimony and answers.

C. On October 9, 2012, the Plaintiff dissatisfied with the above disposition, filed a petition review with the Gyeonggi-do Review Committee, and the said Review Committee changed the disposition of suspension from office for the Plaintiff on December 17, 2012 by one month of reduction of salary and two months of reduction of salary.

(hereinafter referred to as the "instant disposition"), which has been mitigated for two months, is a ground for recognition. 【No dispute exists, and evidence Nos. 1 and 2 are numbers.