logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2019.01.24 2018고단7551
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine of 5,00,000 won and by imprisonment of 10 months for each of the defendants B.

Defendant

A The above fine shall be imposed.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

From September 28, 2017 to June 27, 2018, Defendants gathered to operate a sexual traffic business establishment with seven smuggling, shower rooms, and waiting rooms in the first floor of Gwanak-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Seoul Special Metropolitan City.

On March 7, 2018, the Defendants received 100,000 won in cash from E, a customer, as the price for sexual traffic, from E, and provided guidance to a room, and the Defendants assisted F, a sexual traffic female, to engage in sexual intercourse with the said customer.

At around 19:00 on May 2, 2018, the Defendants continued to receive 110,000 won in cash from customers G from the said “D” as the price for sexual traffic, and provided guidance to the room, and arrange for the said G to have sexual traffic women H to sexual intercourse.

Accordingly, the Defendants conspired to commit acts such as arranging sexual traffic for business purposes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ legal statement

1. A protocol concerning the examination of suspects of G, F, and E by the prosecution;

1. A protocol concerning the police investigation of H concerning H;

1. Business registration certificate, appearance of D business establishment, field photographs, and application of each statute of the lease contract;

1. Paragraph (1) of Article 19 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic concerning facts constituting an offense is deemed to be a clerical error, and Paragraph (2) of Article 2 of the Act shall be corrected and stated.

Subparagraph 1, Article 30 of the Criminal Act

1. As to Defendant A, the choice of the punishment shall be punished by a fine, and as to Defendant B, by imprisonment, respectively;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for detention in a workhouse (for the defendant A),

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (or Article 62 (1) against Defendant B);

1. Defendant B, on the grounds of sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act (as to Defendant A), has the record of being notified of a summary order of a fine of three million won as the act of arranging sexual traffic was controlled at the same place as the instant case.

On the other hand, the defendants reflects the facts charged.

Defendant

A does not have any history of punishment for the same kind of crime, and the degree of participation is relatively weak.

Defendants.

arrow