The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The gist of the grounds of appeal is that the Defendant recognized all of the instant crimes and is in profoundly against the Defendant, and that the Defendant did not make reimbursement on behalf of the Defendant due to a good economic situation where the Defendant’s penal system is not good, but the Defendant maintained a relative relationship with his family; the Defendant has finished imprisonment with prison labor for a long time; the Defendant has an active treatment intent for alcohol addiction; and the Defendant has an intention to make reimbursement for damage. In light of the above, the sentence imposed by the lower court is too unreasonable.

2. The fact that the Defendant recognized the instant crime, is in profoundly against the nature of the instant crime, and is determined to be treated with light to alcohol addiction, etc., is favorable to the sentencing.

However, in light of the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, etc., as well as the majority of the criminal records of the same crime, and the Defendant’s completion of the execution of punishment for the same kind of crime and the fact that there was no damage reimbursement, and the victim did not reach an agreement with the victims, it is not determined that the Defendant’s punishment for the lower court should be reversed to the extent that it is unreasonable.

The defendant's assertion of unfair sentencing is without merit.

3. Accordingly, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the appeal by the defendant is groundless. It is so decided as per Disposition