The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (misunderstanding the facts) is true that the Defendant loaded one ton truck in a warehouse of the C apartment complex as stated in the facts charged, but most of the goods were wastes, and the recycled goods were also the owner of the goods.

In addition, the defendant is not subject to larceny since he obtained prior consent from the head E of the Department E of the company that collects recyclable goods from the person who has the right to dispose of the above goods.

2. The Defendant had already asserted as stated in the grounds of appeal at the lower court, and the lower court rejected the above assertion on the grounds that the judgment “as to the Defendant and the defense counsel’s assertion” was detailed.

Examining the evidence duly adopted and examined by the lower court and the circumstances admitted by the JJ’s legal statement by comparison with the records of the instant case, the Defendant thefted the instant recycled goods.

The judgment of the court below is just and acceptable.

The defendant's assertion of facts is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.