The appeal is dismissed.

The grounds of appeal are examined.

The judgment below

Examining the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, in light of the evidence duly admitted by the court below, it is just that the court below maintained the judgment of the court of first instance ordering the defendant to additionally collect KRW 80 million with respect to the act of arranging sexual traffic of this case, and there is no error of law by misapprehending the legal principles as to additional collection, as alleged in the

On the other hand, the argument that the court below erred in incomplete deliberation as to whether the defendant constitutes concurrent crimes under the latter part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act is not a legitimate ground for appeal, as alleged in the ground of appeal by the court below which did not consider it as a ground for appeal or ex officio.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.