The judgment of the court below is reversed.

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

except that the ruling shall be made for one year from the date of the final judgment.

1. In light of all the circumstances, including the following: (a) the summary of the grounds for appeal (e.g., imprisonment for four months) that the Defendant sought to live together C due to the problem of raising children; (b) but C did not look at the Defendant; (c) caused the instant crime; and (d) brought up young children for 11 months, etc., the sentence imposed by the lower court is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment of the court below is acknowledged that the defendant promised to pay the child support, etc. for the 11-month children living together with the victim E living together with C on the ground that he did not comply with the promise to pay the child support, etc. for the 11-month child produced by himself, and thereby damaging the victim E by impairing the house of the victim E living together with C so that the sum of repair cost 2,726,00 won is damaged. When the head, etc. of E, the victim F, who is the mother of E, takes place as a steel tool, the victim F, etc., for about two weeks of medical treatment, and the defendant used the violence promptly without trying to solve the problem of raising the son through legal procedure, it is not good that the crime is committed. The victim's damage was not recovered, and the defendant did not receive any use from the victims.

However, although the defendant continued to contact C to solve the problem of fostering children, it seems that C had sought the house of victim E to contact C to meet the problem of fostering children, and it would result in the crime of this case somewhat contingent and contingent. The defendant is suffering from hearing disability of class 5 and the defendant seems to have not good economic conditions as a basic living recipient, but deposit KRW 200,00 for victim E even though he did not have good economic conditions, and when considering the fact that the defendant was at a location to support children in 11 months, the defendant was at a location to support them, and the deposit, etc. of the defendant, it appears that the defendant is remarkably divided the defendant's age, character, character, environment, and this case.