logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 2017.08.09 2017고단2290
사기등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[2] The first preceding offense case: The court below's ruling of habitual larceny on June 25, 2015: imprisonment with prison labor for six months: the second preceding offense case on October 23, 2015: the Busan District Court's decision on June 23, 2016, which was subject to review of theft of structures at night at night at 40 Hun-Ga and 40 Hun-Ga, Busan District Court's 2012 No. 2736 decided November 9, 2012 (one year and six years of suspension of execution, three years of protection, observation of social service, and 240 hours): the court below's ruling on June 1 and six years of suspension of execution, three years of probation, community service, and 240 hours: Kim Jong-il's decision on July 1, 2016 / [the defendant did not have any personal character of customers by entering his/her store, and did not know that he/she had any personal character of customers with his/her clothes.

1. On June 3, 2017, around 08:35, the Defendant invadedd a structure with the mind that the Defendant steals the article in front of the above victim’s store and carried it into the above store.

Accordingly, the defendant invadedd the building managed by the victim D.

2. The Defendant, at the above date, at the place, stated that “The Defendant was a guest with the above store as if he were a guest with the above store, and, at the same time, stated that “The Defendant had received 35,000 won in cash and received 50,000 won in cash as he had been in charge of repairing clothes prior to that store.”

However, the defendant did not receive any money from the injured party because he did not receive any money from the injured party because he was in charge of the repair of clothes or delivered the money.

Nevertheless, the defendant, as above, made a false statement to the victim and received 35,000 won in cash from the victim, i.e., the victim.

3. The Defendant, as described in the above date, at the place, by deceiving the victim as stated in paragraph 2, received money, and let the victim find the key before being assigned to him, and let the victim find it, thereby neglecting the care of the victim.

arrow