beta
Text
The judgment below
Of them, the part against Defendant A shall be reversed.
Defendant
A shall be sentenced to four months of imprisonment and fine of KRW 4,00,000.
Reasons
1. In light of the summary of the grounds for appeal in this case’s sentencing conditions, the lower court’s sentence against the Defendants (for the Defendant A: 2 years of suspended execution of imprisonment for April, 4 years of fine of fine of KRW 4 million, Defendant B: fine of KRW 5 million) is too heavy or unreasonable.
2. Before deciding on the assertion of unfair sentencing by Defendant A and the prosecutor, prior to the judgment on the assertion of unfair sentencing by Defendant A, the lower court stated in Article 134 of the Criminal Act on the collection of additional charges on the grounds that the decision did not sentence the collection of additional charges against Defendant A in the text, and the judgment of the lower court against Defendant A was no longer maintained on the ground that this is inconsistent with the order and the reasons.
3. Defendant B and the prosecutor’s assertion of the judgment on the offering of this case together, and Defendant B acknowledged the crime of offering of this case and reflects his mistake, and Defendant B did not have any serious criminal record exceeding the same kind and fine. The offering of this case’s offering of this case’s offering of this case’s offering of this case’s offering of this case’s offering of this case’s payment of money of KRW 2 million in the name of business promotion expenses, expenses, etc. at the request of Defendant B, the chairman of the promotion committee (hereinafter “promotion committee”) in order to maintain the relationship with the E promotion committee, and it seems that there is no special solicitation. The offering of this case’s offering of this case’s offering of this case’s offering of this case’s offering of money in relation to his duties is not easy to say that Defendant B’s offering of money in relation to his duties, and that the nature and circumstances of the crime may cause damage to the general public’s trust in the performance of the duties of the chairman of the promotion committee and to exercise overall control of law.