(영문) 수원지방법원안양지원 2014.12.18 2013가단20203

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 수원지방법원안양지원 2014.12.18 2013가단20203

손해배상

Text

1. All of the plaintiff's claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Summary of the plaintiff's assertion

A. Claim 1) The Defendant was in an internal relationship with C, a spouse of the Plaintiff’s de facto marital marriage. However, in recognition of the relationship with C on June 14, 2013, upon the Plaintiff’s knowledge of such circumstance, the agreement that “any act connected to C, such as e-mail, hosting, Internet, correspondence, contact, and correspondence, shall not be performed, and in the case of only one way, KRW 60 million shall be paid to the Plaintiff. In addition, the agreement that “The Plaintiff will pay KRW 20 million to the Plaintiff by June 30, 2015, on condition that the Plaintiff would not file a civil criminal complaint” (hereinafter “instant agreement”).

(2) However, the Defendant is obligated to pay to the Plaintiff KRW 80 million and damages for delay, in accordance with the terms and conditions of the agreement, since the Defendant continued to engage in C even after the agreement of this case.

B. Preliminaryly claiming consolation money, the Defendant has a duty to pay consolation money to the Plaintiff as consolation money for the amount of KRW 20 million and its delay damages, since the Defendant brought about mental pain to the Plaintiff, a de facto marital spouse, a de facto marital spouse.

2. Determination

A. 1) First, on June 14, 2013, whether the Defendant had entered into the instant agreement or not, and the evidence Nos. 1 and 2 (Agreement) as shown in the Plaintiff’s assertion are written in each of the above documents without the Defendant’s signature, seal, or seal (the Defendant’s name’s unmanned was confirmed to be inconsistent with the Defendant’s Unmanned as a result of the appraiser D’s appraisal, and there was no evidence to acknowledge that the above unmanned is the Defendant’s unmanned.

Of the above documents, the defendant's name, address, and resident registration certificate are merely written in the defendant's name, address, and resident registration certificate, and most contents including the plaintiff's assertion agreement can be seen to have been written in the plaintiff's agent who is not the defendant, and the defendant's name, address, and written contents are confirmed by the defendant

유사 판례

-대구지방법원 영덕지원 2018.03.13 2017가단631

-대전지방법원 2016.10.18 2015나13087

-수원지방법원 2020.02.06 2018나12916

-인천지방법원 2018.03.16 2017나66476

-의정부지방법원 2017.09.27 2016가단17484