beta
Text
1. The Defendant’s KRW 5,866,285 as well as the Plaintiff’s KRW 5% per annum from October 24, 2015 to October 26, 2017.
Reasons
1. Establishment of liability for damages;
A. At around 10:10 on October 24, 2015, 10:10, 2015, 1 B entered the above intersection due to the negligence of entering the above intersection due to the violation of the new subparagraph in the E section where C SPP car was driven at the E section where D was located, and at the time, the Plaintiff’s front part of the FPP or other car, which was passed at the above intersection with the flood inside the flood of the water at the time, was seriously affected by the above SP car’s side with the above SP car’s side (hereinafter “instant accident”), and 2 The Defendant is liable to compensate the Plaintiff for damages due to the lack of dispute between the parties who concluded the comprehensive insurance contract for the above SP car, or due to the accident of Gap’s Nos. 1 through 4, and No. 1, No. 1, and No. 1 (hereinafter the same shall apply).
B. Meanwhile, according to the aforementioned evidence, the Plaintiff may also recognize the negligence that entered the above intersection in violation of the new subparagraph, and such negligence also seems to have contributed to the occurrence and expansion of damages caused by the instant accident, and thus, the Defendant’s liability is limited to 50% by taking into account the determination of the amount of damages to be compensated by the Defendant.
2. The following facts can be acknowledged in full view of the evidence mentioned above, as follows: Gap evidence Nos. 6, 7, and Eul evidence Nos. 1 and 5; and the result of the commission of physical examination to the medical school Synae Hospital at the school of the year of this Court:
In principle, the period for the convenience of calculation shall be calculated on a monthly basis, but the period of less than the last month and less than KRW 1 shall be discarded.
The calculation of the current value at the time of the accident shall be based on the reduction rate of 5/12 percent per month to deduct the interim interest.
And the parties' arguments.