logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2017.06.20 2017고정448
하수도법위반
Text

The sentence of sentence against the defendant shall be suspended.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who owns a building with a floor size of 247.18 square meters above the floor area in Gwangjin-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City and engages in real estate rental business.

No owner or manager of a private sewage treatment facility shall discharge wastewater from a building, etc. without flowing it into a private sewage treatment facility, or install a facility capable of discharging wastewater without flowing it into a private sewage treatment facility.

Nevertheless, from the end of January 2008 to October 9, 2016, the Defendant installed toilets inside the stores of “D”, “E”, and “F” on the first floor of the said building, and installed the pipes of sewage connected to public sewage pipes, and used the pipes, thereby directly discharging sewage generated from each shop toilet into the septic tank instead of flowing it into the septic tank.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A reporter's written statement;

1. Application of C septic tank photographs, general building ledgers, current status of collection, and Acts and subordinate statutes on the scene of violation of suspect-based photographs;

1. Article 77 subparagraph 7 of the Act and Article 39 (1) 1 of the Act and the selection of fines concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. A fine of 700,000 won to be suspended;

1. Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act (100,000 won per day) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Although the reason for sentencing under Article 59(1) of the Criminal Code of the Suspension of Pronouncement of Sentence (the circumstances favorable to the defendant among the reasons for sentencing) is recognized to have been discharged as a public sewage pipe for a long time, the punishment as ordered is determined by taking into account the defendant’s age, sexual conduct, etc., including the fact that the wastewater has been discharged as a public sewage pipe, but there is no criminal history for the same crime committed by the defendant, and that there is no possibility that the criminal act will continue any longer after the defendant was newly

arrow