1. The independent party intervenor's appeal is dismissed;

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the intervenor of the independent party.

1. When an independent party intervention in a lawsuit filed by an independent party intervention pursuant to Article 79 of the Civil Procedure Act is deemed lawful and a judgment on the merits is rendered on the lawsuit between the plaintiff, the defendant and the independent party intervenor, a final judgment rendered on the title holder of the above three parties should be rendered. In the event one party appeals on the merits, the entire final judgment of the first instance court shall be interrupted, and the whole of the case shall take effect. In such a case, the subject of the appellate court's judgment shall be limited to the scope of objection indicated in the purport of the appeal by the person who actually filed the appeal, and the scope of the judgment shall be determined by considering the need for the joint conclusion between the above three parties (see Supreme Court Decision 2009Da71312, Nov. 13, 2014; Supreme Court Decision 2009Da71394, Oct. 13, 2014; the plaintiffs asserted that the defendant's heir is not the deceased E, and the plaintiffs' heir of the deceased's claim for the transfer registration of shares in the title of this case;