logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 2015.04.15 2013구합2000683
요양불승인처분 취소 청구의 소
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On January 1, 2006, the Plaintiff joined the management team leader as an incorporated association B (hereinafter “instant center”).

B. On September 6, 2012, at around 10:00, the Plaintiff received medical care from the Center under the diagnosis of “the brain color, cardiopulmonary scarcity, detailed high blood pressure of unknown scarcitys, detailed scarcitys, scarcitys, prone, and parasium in a human-gymninic gymosis with no dysia,” in the Center’s medical examination of the conditions of aquatic damage recovery, and there were two symptoms.

C. The Plaintiff filed an application for industrial accident compensation insurance with the Defendant stating as a disaster circumstance that “the brain fluoral color, heart fluoral bomb, detailed highly known high pressure, detailed blood pressure, fluoral fluoral fluorial fluorial fluorial fluorial fluorial fluorals, hair, fluoral fluorial fluorals, and fluoral fluorial fluorial flusium

On January 2, 2013, the Defendant rendered a disposition not to grant medical care (hereinafter referred to as the “instant disposition”) on the ground that the Plaintiff’s “satisfying, satisfying, and satfying satfying, satching, and satisfying” expressed symptoms to be considered as an existing disease that the Plaintiff had no medical history, and that it is not reasonable as the name of the injury under the Industrial Accident Insurance Act, and that “satisfying, satching, and satching” was performed in the course of volunteer service in a state that has not been confirmed to have a significant degree of influence on the satfy’s natural progress, and that there is no proximate causal link between the duties and the duties of the satfys.

E. The Plaintiff filed a request for reexamination to revoke the instant disposition with the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Reexamination Committee, but the said Committee filed a request on May 10, 2013.

arrow