1. The defendant shall attach attached Form 5,271 square meters to the plaintiff, among the buildings of the miscellaneous area 5,271 square meters above ground-based prefabricated branch.

The plaintiff is an organization consisting of merchants of the above market for the purpose of managing the A market located D in the following cities in the following cities: The plaintiff is an organization for the purpose of the management of the A market located in the following cities:

On March 6, 2017, the Plaintiff (seller) concluded a sales contract with the Defendant (Buyer) for E-ho (in the order of each point listed in attached Table 1, 2, 3, 4, and 1; hereinafter “instant store”) with the store located in the instant market, the total purchase price of KRW 3,500,000 for the remainder 4,00,000 for E-ho (in the order of each point listed in attached Table 1, 2, 3, 4, and 1; hereinafter “instant store”).

On March 17, 2017, the date of payment was determined and concluded.

(hereinafter “instant contract”). The Defendant paid the Plaintiff the down payment of KRW 3,500,000 on the day of the instant contract, and around that time, occupied the instant store and started its business.

The Defendant did not pay any balance on or after March 17, 2017, which is the remaining payment date under the instant contract. On April 10, 2017, and April 12, 2017, the Plaintiff sent to the Defendant a content-certified mail stating that “the instant store is delivered by April 15, 2017, as the Defendant rescinded the instant contract on the grounds of the Defendant’s default on the payment of the remainder,” and the Defendant sent a content-certified mail again to the same effect as the Defendant did not comply therewith, and the Plaintiff sent a content-certified mail again on April 21, 2017.

(2) Each of the instant notifications can be seen as the Plaintiff’s performance of the contract against the Defendant, based on the following facts: (a) there is no dispute; (b) evidence Nos. 1 through 6; and (c) evidence Nos. 1 through 1; and (c) the purport of the entire pleadings; and (d) the purport of the rescission of the instant contract and the recognition of the obligation to deliver the instant documents. The fact that the duplicate of the instant complaint, which was based on the premise of the rescission of the instant contract, was delivered to the Defendant on May 31, 2017, is apparent in the record; and (c) at least, the instant contract was rescinded by the Plaintiff

I would like to say.

The plaintiff has already been a store in this case to the defendant.