A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

Punishment of the crime

On June 1, 2019, the Defendant: (a) around 19:10, at the convenience point of “the victim C, who works in Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-si B as an employee; (b) taken his own form a mobile camera, thereby misunderstanding that the victim took the victim’s photograph with a large voice of “whether he is dwarfing, spathing, and dead,” and obstructed the victim’s convenience store management by force by avoiding disturbance between about 10 minutes of the victim’s disturbance, such as giving him an article in front of the calculating stand.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. C’s statement;

1. Application of the evidence list Nos. 2 investigation reports, investigation reports (CCTV verification investigation), and the Act and subordinate statutes to the investigation reports (in the opinion of the investigator);

1. Relevant Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act, the reason for sentencing choice of imprisonment - The defendant denied the crime by an investigative agency, but in this court, recognized the crime.

- The Defendant reported 112 cases, such as the following: (a) the victim, who is an employee of a convenience store, was able to take a bath and sacrife the disturbance; and (b) the surrounding customers who have observed it were “a man who has taken a bath shall take a female employee at a convenience store.”

At the time of the police's mobilization, the victim was out of the brucking, the defendant was able to take a bath in large interest, and the police attempted to take the brupt, and the police attempted to take the brush and control him.

- On February 23, 2018, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for six months, two years of suspended execution, and probation, and committed the same crime during suspended execution.

In addition, there was a total of 23 times punishment for all the same and different types of crimes. Among them, 70,000 won as to the crime of interference with business on February 17, 2010, 500,000 won as to the crime of interference with business on September 17, 2013, 100,000 won as to the crime of interference with business on July 8, 2016, 1.5 million won as to the crime of interference with business on November 10, 2016, and 1.5 million won as to the crime of interference with business on May 26, 2017.