1. The Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff) shall:

A. Of the land No. 1 listed in the List of Real Estate in Annex 1, the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) shall be attached.

1. Basic facts

A. On May 9, 1973, the Plaintiff completed the registration of share ownership transfer under 6773, which was received on May 9, 1973, with respect to the share of 1/4 of the land listed in the list of real estate in the separate sheet Nos. 1 and 3, and completed the registration of share ownership transfer under the receipt of No. 5998, Jan. 30, 2015, with respect to the remainder of 3/4 shares.

The plaintiff completed the registration of transfer of ownership on the land No. 2 in the attached list of real estate in the attached Form No. 3544, Oct. 11, 1943, as to the land No. 2.

Notwithstanding the registration of ownership transfer between the Plaintiff and the Defendant, the Plaintiff is the owner of each of the instant lands, and there is no dispute as to the fact that the Defendant leased each of the instant lands from the Plaintiff, the owner of each of the instant

(hereinafter referred to as "each land of this case" in the separate sheet of real estate in the separate sheet, and each land listed in the separate sheet of real estate in the separate sheet is individually referred to as "each land of this case". B.

The plaintiff is no longer aware of the time when the lease contract between the plaintiff and the defendant was first concluded, and the plaintiff and the defendant are not aware of the exact time.

The plaintiff and the defendant have stated that they reside on the ground of each land of this case from 50 years ago.

In addition, the Plaintiff asserts to the effect that the lease contract was concluded prior to 2000, since the Plaintiff received the rent prior to 2000, and the Defendant was paid the rent prior to 2007. Thus, the Plaintiff asserted to the effect that the lease contract was concluded prior to 2007.

Therefore, at least before 2007, the lease contract for each of the instant lands was concluded.

The Defendant asserted that each of the lands of this case was concluded without setting the term of lease and without setting the term of lease, and the Defendant made an agreement on the term of lease.