1. The plaintiff's claims against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. On March 11, 2014, the Plaintiff and Defendant B Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant E”)’s lease contract 1) the Plaintiff concluded with Defendant E on March 1, 2014 the F factory site and the factory building on its ground (hereinafter “instant real estate”).

(B) As to the lease deposit, a lease agreement was concluded with the Plaintiff and Nonparty D Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “D”) with the following terms: KRW 65 million; KRW 6.5 million per month; KRW 10,000 per month; and the lease period until April 10, 2018 (48 months).

(1) On September 7, 2015, Defendant E requested the Plaintiff to change the lessee under the above lease agreement to D.

2) On September 7, 2015, the Plaintiff entered into a lease agreement with D as stipulated under the terms of KRW 65 million for the instant real estate, KRW 65 million for the following month (payment of interest at 25% per annum for delay), KRW 6.5 million for the instant real estate (hereinafter “instant lease agreement”) and the term of lease from September 1, 2015 to March 31, 2018 (31 months) (hereinafter “instant lease agreement”).

(2) Around that time, the Plaintiff transferred the instant real estate to D, and D paid KRW 65 million to the Plaintiff the lease deposit.

3) Accordingly, D paid to the Plaintiff the difference between September 2015 and November 2015. [The fact that there is no dispute over the basis of recognition, Gap’s entries in subparagraphs 1 through 3, and 5, and the purport of the entire pleadings.]

2. Judgment on the plaintiff's assertion

A. The gist of the assertion is that: (a) the Plaintiff did not pay the pertinent rent or without any authority until the end of the instant lease agreement; (b) the Plaintiff agreed to deliver the instant real estate by May 30, 2016; (c) thereby causing damage to the Plaintiff to pay the penalty to the new lessee; (d) the Plaintiff destroyed the instant real estate while using the instant real estate, or neglected large quantities of waste while leaving the instant real estate on December 15, 2016, thereby causing damage to the Plaintiff.

Therefore, it is true.