The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. The gist of the grounds for appeal is the statement of the victim and the situation at the time, etc., in spite of sufficient recognition of the defendant's intention to commit an indecent act or indecent act, the victim intended to agree;

The judgment of the court below which denied the criminal intent of the defendant was erroneous in the misapprehension of legal principles on the sole ground that it can be seen as a second step.

2. The lower court found the Defendant not guilty of the facts charged in the instant case to the effect that the Defendant could not be ruled out the possibility that the Defendant might have a sloping bridge on the locked without the victim’s intention, although the fact that the Defendant met from the right end of the victim’s right end to the sloping part.

In light of the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below, the victim was placed on the right side of the entrance of 4-5 male, which appears to be a high school student, and the adult female name was placed next to the court below, and the defendant stated to the effect that one adult male name was enjoyed on the left side of the entrance (Evidence No. 18,26 of the record). The defendant was sent to the investigative agency without any special consideration, where there was an empty space on the front side and the room of the entrance, and the defendant was sent to the court below without any special consideration, and the victim was trying to take part in the entrance at the investigative agency, and the victim was able to take part in the entrance (Evidence No. 56 of the evidence record). The victim's driving distance was the victim's body in the court below, and the victim and the defendant stated to the effect that he was she was she first arbit between the victim and the adult victim's body and the defendant's body (the victim's body was ar. 8.