logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 안동지원 2015.07.24 2015고단215
119구조ㆍ구급에관한법률위반
Text

1. The defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months;

2. Provided, That the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive;

3.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

No person shall interfere with rescue operations and emergency medical services of 119 rescue and emergency medical services teams.

On March 21, 2015, at around 22:40, the Defendant: (a) confirmed the condition of E by an emergency medical service worker D of the Yongsan 119 Safety Center, who was called up after receiving a report from an injured person on the street in front of a C cafeteria located in Ansan-si B; and (b) reported that D put E on the inside bed for the purpose of transmitting hospital after the hospital after the hospital, and (c) attached D’s clothes to “I am. I am. I am. I am. I am. I am. I am. I am. I am.”, and “I am. I am. I am. I am. I am.? I am. I am. I am. I am. I am. I am.”, and am. I interfere with the emergency medical services of D 119 emergency medical services.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. A report on an accident involving an emergency medical service worker;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on investigation reporting;

1. Relevant provisions of the Acts concerning the facts constituting an offense, and Articles 28 and 13 (2) and (1) of the Act on 119 Rescue and Emergency Medical Services Options;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act ( considered as favorable circumstances, etc. among the reasons for sentencing following the suspended sentence);

1. The crime of this case for the reason of sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Probation Criminal Act is likely to be subject to criticism because it interferes with the activities of 119 rescue and first aid units.

In addition, even before the instant case, the Defendant is highly likely to be subject to criminal punishment for other crimes.

However, the defendant seems to have committed the crime of this case in a contingent manner, there is no record of punishment for the same kind of crime, and shows a attitude to reflect the mistake.

In light of the above circumstances and the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, the sentence like the order was determined and the suspended sentence was selected.

arrow