1. The defendant is against the plaintiffs:

(a) deliver the real estate listed in the separate sheet;

B. From April 12, 2015, the above real estate.

The Plaintiffs leased real estate listed in the separate sheet (hereinafter “instant real estate”) to the Defendant as KRW 15,00,000 for lease deposit, KRW 1,700 for each rent month, and KRW 1,700,000 for each rent (excluding value-added tax). The Defendant delayed the possession of the instant real estate on at least two occasions from March 11, 2007, and the Plaintiff did not dispute the termination of the said lease contract on or around November 5, 2013. Therefore, the Defendant delivered the instant real estate to the Plaintiffs, and the Plaintiff was excluded from the instant claim on the ground that the overdue rent of KRW 14,960,00 for April 12, 2015 was deducted from the said lease deposit.

Until the completion date of delivery of the real estate of this case, it is obligated to pay the amount calculated by the ratio of KRW 1,870,000 per month, which is the amount equivalent to the rent.

In regard to this, the Defendant asserted that the instant real estate was destroyed by aging and thus requires approximately KRW 30,00,000 for facility cost, and thus, the Plaintiff is obligated to compensate for it. However, there is no evidence to acknowledge the above assertion, and it is difficult to accept it.

Therefore, the plaintiff's claim of this case is justified, and it is so decided as per Disposition.