The defendant shall be innocent.

1. The Defendant, at around 15:00 on July 8, 2016, committed the instant facts charged, as if he were able to take the face of the victims by using the polybane presses that were in his hand during the dispute and thrown away with the victim C (70 years of age), the victim D (68 years of age), and waste at the same parking lot of Dongdaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government building B, Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul. In addition, the Defendant was able to take a look at the face of the victims.

The victims were threatened by the victims, "I", and the victims were threatened.

2. Determination

A. Intimidation means a threat of harm that may cause fear to an individual. As such, an intentional act as a subjective constituent element does not require any intent or desire to actually realize the harm that an actor knows to such an extent that it is likely to cause fear. However, if the actor’s speech or behavior is merely an emotional expression or temporary dispersion, and it is objectively evident that there is no intention to harm in light of the surrounding circumstances, it shall not be recognized as an act of intimidation or a threat. However, whether the act of intimidation or the intent of intimidation was made shall be determined by comprehensively considering not only the external appearance but also surrounding circumstances, such as the background leading to such act, relationship with the victim, etc. (see Supreme Court Decision 90Do2102, May 10, 191, 199; Supreme Court Decision 90Do2102, May 10, 199).

Sticker’s parity is called “Flavery”.