logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2014.01.27 2013고단2405
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(위험운전치사상)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a Clearning car.

On September 28, 2013, the Defendant driven the said car at a speed of 0.178% alcohol level on blood alcohol level at 0.15: (a) and driven the said car at a speed of 50km per hour at the speed of 50km per hour, depending on the side of the city in the front of the Sinscopic Hospital at the Sinscopic City, Sincopic City. However, under the influence of alcohol, the Defendant found the victim D (52 years old) 14 tons of the victim D (52 years old) driving the vehicle at the right-hand left-hand, and received the front-hand part of the said truck with the front-hand part of the said passenger vehicle.

As a result, the defendant was able to drive the car in a state where normal driving is difficult due to influence of drinking, and caused a traffic accident by driving the car, and caused the victim to suffer the salt and tension of the entire flag that requires treatment for about two weeks.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. A report on detection of a host driver and a circumstantial report on the host driver;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the actual survey report and diagnosis report;

1. Relevant Article 5-11 of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes, Articles 148-2 (2) 2 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act, and choice of imprisonment with prison labor for the crime;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspension of execution (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 62 (1)

arrow